Comment
Author: Admin | 2025-04-28
Not qualified plaintiffs. If they sue, they should file a case separately and try it separately. 2. The respondent's investment was not 2.5 million yuan, but 9.8 million yuan. In the process of performance, the respondent paid more than 5 million yuan into Zhang Zhiqin's personal account. The reason why the remaining money was not paid into the company was that Zhang Zhiqin did not inform the company to transfer the shares by mortgage, so he asked to find out the facts and rejected the plaintiff's claim there is a big dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant about the amount of Chen Zhishun's investment and the loss of Baoyuan company caused by the investment not in place. As for the amount of investment, the plaintiff recognized that Chen Zhishun had invested 2.5 million yuan in total, and submitted the remittance slips from Chen Zhishun to Baoyuan company on July 10, 2007, August 1, 2007, and September 17, 2007, with the amount of 1 million yuan, 1.2 million yuan, and 300000 yuan respectively. Chen Zhishun claimed that in addition to the above money, he also remitted more than 9 million yuan to Zhang Zhiqin for many times, with the existing evidence of 7.12 million yuan, The plaintiff recognized the 2.5 million yuan remitted to the company, but did not accept it. He thought that the evidence was a , and said that the money on the above-mentioned documents was remitted to Zhang Zhiqin's personal account. Zhang Zhiqin and Chen Zhishun
Add Comment